Evaluation of Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrests in Births and Neonates: Opportunities to Improve Care

INTRODUCTION: Home births have increased 77% from 2004 to 2017 and further increased with the COVID-19 pandemic. While the majority of home births are uneventful, some are complicated and require attendance of emergency medical services (EMS). Understanding characteristics of out-of-hospital births and EMS care is increasingly important to improve care. METHODS: We conducted a chart review of pediatric out-of-hospital cardiac arrests (POHCAs) from EMS agencies across the United States to evaluate the care provided by first responders. The study was approved by Oregon Health & Science University and respective IRBs. RESULTS: Of 1,020 POHCAs, 54 were responses to births and 43 were for other neonates. While most neonatal POHCAs occurred in a home or residence (84%), some births occurred at other locations such as a health care facility, public or commercial building, and street or highway. Bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation was performed in less than half of births but more than half of other neonates. Return of spontaneous circulation was twice as likely for births as for other neonates (27% versus 13%). Overall, serious adverse safety events were observed in three-fourths of neonatal resuscitations. Births were more likely to be associated with failure to follow the correct resuscitation algorithm and lack of positive pressure ventilation. CONCLUSION: There are unique challenges in the care of out-of-hospital births for the EMS system. There is an opportunity to improve use of neonatal resuscitation protocols and early ventilation. [ FROM AUTHOR] Copyright of Obstetrics & Gynecology is the property of Lippincott Williams & Wilkins and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full . (Copyright applies to all s.)

The scandals of covid-19

Where clinicians once believed "there is no harm trying,” they realise that CPR offers little benefit to patients but brings significant risk to staff as they wait for the protective equipment that was promised in the UK and globally (doi:10.1136/bmj.m1423;doi:10.1136/bmj.m1367). Adding to the scandals of unpreparedness and lack of personal protective equipment is the scandal of testing. Germany's relatively low case fatality rate is helped by an "early and high level of testing” (doi:10.1136/bmj.m1395).

State of implementation of the Corona-Virus-Disease-2019 resuscitation guidelines : An online-based survey one year after publication in Germany.

BACKGROUND: The present study evaluated the implementation of the European Resuscitation Council Corona-Virus-Disease 2019 (COVID-19) resuscitation guidelines in Germany 1 year after publication. AIM OF THE WORK: To evaluate the practical implementation of the COVID-19 resuscitation guidelines in Germany one year after their publication. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In an online survey between April and May 2021 participants were asked about awareness of COVID-19 resuscitation guidelines, corresponding training, the resuscitation algorithm used and COVID-19 infections of emergency medicine personnel associated with COVID-19 resuscitation. RESULTS: A total of 961 (8%) of the 11,000 members took part in the survey and 85% (818/961) of questionnaires were fully completed. While 577 (70%) of the respondents were aware of the COVID-19 guidelines, only 103 (13%) had received respective training. A specific COVID-19 resuscitation algorithm was used by 265 respondents (32%). Adaptations included personal protective equipment (99%), reduction of staff caring for the patient, or routine use of video laryngoscopy for endotracheal intubation (each 37%), securing the airway before rhythm analysis (32%), and pausing chest compressions during endotracheal intubation (30%). Respondents without a specific COVID-19 resuscitation algorithm were more likely to use mouth-nose protection (47% vs. 31%; p < 0.001), extraglottic airway devices (66% vs. 55%; p = 0.004) and have more than 4 team members close to the patient (45% vs. 38%; p = 0.04). Use of an Filtering-Face-Piece(FFP)-2 or FFP3 mask (89% vs. 77%; p < 0.001; 58% vs. 70%; p ≤ 0.001) or performing primary endotracheal intubation (17% vs. 31%; p < 0.001) were found less frequently and 9% reported that a team member was infected with COVID-19 during resuscitation. CONCLUSION: The COVID-19 resuscitation guidelines are still insufficiently implemented 1 year after publication. Future publication strategies must ensure that respective guideline adaptations are implemented in a timely manner.

COVID-19 and stroke: A review.

COVID-19 patients have presented with a wide range of neurological disorders, among which stroke is the most devastating. We have reviewed current studies, case series, and case reports with a focus on COVID-19 patients complicated with stroke, and presented the current understanding of stroke in this patient population. As evidenced by increased D-dimer, fibrinogen, factor VIII and von Willebrand factor, SARS-CoV-2 infection induces coagulopathy, disrupts endothelial function, and promotes hypercoagulative state. Collectively, it predisposes patients to cerebrovascular events. Additionally, due to the unprecedented strain on the healthcare system, stroke care has been inevitably compromised. The underlying mechanism between COVID-19 and stroke warrants further study, so does the development of an effective therapeutic or preventive intervention.

Impact of COVID-19-adapted guidelines using different airway management strategies on resuscitation quality in out-of-hospital-cardiac-arrest - a randomised manikin study.

BACKGROUND: Although airway management for paramedics has moved away from endotracheal intubation towards extraglottic airway devices in recent years, in the context of COVID-19, endotracheal intubation has seen a revival. Endotracheal intubation has been recommended again under the assumption that it provides better protection against aerosol liberation and infection risk for care providers than extraglottic airway devices accepting an increase in no-flow time and possibly worsen patient outcomes. METHODS: In this manikin study paramedics performed advanced cardiac life support with non-shockable (Non-VF) and shockable rhythms (VF) in four settings: ERC guidelines 2021 (control), COVID-19-guidelines using videolaryngoscopic intubation (COVID-19-intubation), laryngeal mask (COVID-19-Laryngeal-Mask) or a modified laryngeal mask modified with a shower cap (COVID-19-showercap) to reduce aerosol liberation simulated by a fog machine. Primary endpoint was no-flow-time, secondary endpoints included data on airway management as well as the participants' subjective assessment of aerosol release using a Likert-scale (0 = no release-10 = maximum release) were collected and statistically compared. Continuous Data was presented as mean ± standard deviation. Interval-scaled Data were presented as median and Q1 and Q3. RESULTS: A total of 120 resuscitation scenarios were completed. Compared to control (Non-VF:11 ± 3 s, VF:12 ± 3 s) application of COVID-19-adapted guidelines lead to prolonged no-flow times in all groups (COVID-19-Intubation: Non-VF:17 ± 11 s, VF:19 ± 5 s;p ≤ 0.001; COVID-19-laryngeal-mask: VF:15 ± 5 s,p ≤ 0.01; COVID-19-showercap: VF:15 ± 3 s,p ≤ 0.01). Compared to COVID-19-Intubation, the use of the laryngeal mask and its modification with a showercap both led to a reduction of no-flow-time(COVID-19-laryngeal-mask: Non-VF:p = 0.002;VF:p ≤ 0.001; COVID-19-Showercap: Non-VF:p ≤ 0.001;VF:p = 0.002) due to a reduced duration of intubation (COVID-19-Intubation: Non-VF:40 ± 19 s;VF:33 ± 17 s; both p ≤ 0.01 vs. control, COVID-19-Laryngeal-Mask (Non-VF:15 ± 7 s;VF:13 ± 5 s;p > 0.05) and COVID-19-Shower-cap (Non-VF:15 ± 5 s;VF:17 ± 5 s;p > 0.05). The participants rated aerosol liberation lowest in COVID-19-intubation (median:0;Q1:0,Q3:2;p < 0.001vs.COVID-19-laryngeal-mask and COVID-19-showercap) compared to COVID-19-shower-cap (median:3;Q1:1,Q3:3 p < 0.001vs.COVID-19-laryngeal-mask) or COVID-19-laryngeal-mask (median:9;Q1:6,Q3:8). CONCLUSIONS: COVID-19-adapted guidelines using videolaryngoscopic intubation lead to a prolongation of no-flow time. The use of a modified laryngeal mask with a shower cap seems to be a suitable compromise combining minimal impact on no-flowtime and reduced aerosol exposure for the involved providers.

Initial five and ten-minute regional cerebral oxygen saturation as a predictor of the futility of resuscitation for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest

This study aimed to investigate the usefulness of cerebral regional oxygen saturation (rSO2) during the initial 5 and 10 minutes of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) compared with an initial rSO2 and mean rSO2 during entire CPR to predict the futility of resuscitation for patients without of-hospital-cardiac arrest (OHCA). This was a prospective study involving 52 adult patients presenting in OHCA and whose cerebral rSO2 values were measured until either CPR was terminated or sustained return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) was achieved. Receiver operating characteristics analyses were used to evaluate which time and type of measurement is better to predict non-ROSC. The area under the curve (AUC) of each rSO2 value according to measurement time (overall, initial 5 minutes and 10 minutes) were the highest value of 0.743, 0.724, and 0.739, mean values of 0.724, 0.677 and 0.701 and rSO2 (Changes in values of regional cerebral oxygen) value of 0.722, 0.734 and 0.724, respectively, while all of the initial values had a poor AUC (<0.7) and also were not statistically significant. The optimal cut-off value of each rSO2 values during overall, initial 5 minutes and 10 minutes were the highest value of 26% (sensitivity, 53.9% specificity, 92.3%), 24% (sensitivity, 56.4% specificity, 92.3%), and 30% (sensitivity, 61.5% specificity, 84.6%), mean value of 15.2%, 15.3% and 16%, respectively. None of the patients with a persistent rSO2 <=18% during the overall period achieved ROSC. Initial 5 minutes and 10 minutes cerebral rSO2 values an out-of-hospital-cardiac arrest (OHCA) are a better predictor in deciding the futility of CPR, compared to initial and overall measurements.Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). Published by MRE Press.

Initiating advance care planning in New South Wales general practices using a structured conversation guide

There is variation in ACP terminology and legislation of ACDs between different jurisdictions within Australia.4 General practice is the ideal setting for ACP discussions, and evidence supports patient preference for initiation of ACP while they are still healthy in the community.5-7 The Royal Australian College of General Practitioners (RACGP) recommends that general practitioners (GPs) discuss ACP as part of routine care for older patients during the annual 75 years and over health assessment.8 The COVID-19 pandemic highlighted the need for GPs to have these conversations, and there have been calls for ACP to be an integral part of pandemic health planning responses.9 Evaluating the prevalence of ACP conversations is difficult, with most studies focusing on the more tangible assessment of ACD completion. Some barriers to GPs initiating ACP include difficulties in defining the right moment to discuss the topic, a perceived lack of knowledge in the ACP process and concern regarding the potential time-consuming nature of ACP discussions.11'12 Strategies to increase initiation of ACP in general practice have focused on workshops and communication skills training for GPs and general practice nurses (GPNs), which are time and resource intensive.13-15 Some studies have shown that discussion guides and question prompt lists can improve the frequency of ACP discussions with patients, but these have been limited to palliative care settings.16-18 Most doctors believe it is their responsibility to initiate these discussions but struggle with timing.19 More evidence is needed to understand how to help GPs facilitate these conversations in a way that is acceptable and meaningful for older patients and their families. [...]it's the family that's really going to make the decision. [Female GP, FG 1.1] Some GPs preferred to focus on clinical decisions such as cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) as the main subject of the conversation, while others preferred to broaden the discussion to general healthcare goals.

Comparison of code blue application and results in a training and research hospital before and during the COVID-19 pandemic

Background & Objective: Code blue is an emergency management system that allows for a rapid professional response to the patients of cardiopulmonary arrest (CPA) in hospitals. The time to initiate the call and the response of the 'Code Blue Team' may vary in different hospitals, and it me be linked with the survival of the victim. We examined and compared the code blue application utilized in our hospital before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. Methodology: Code Blue Call (CBC) logs from March 01, 2018 to March 31, 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. The study period was divided into two parts: March 01, 2018-February 28, 2020 (Group I, pre-pandemic period) and March 01, 2020-March 31, 2022 (Group II, pandemic period). Result(s): During the study period, a total of 1542 CBC's were received, of which 837 (54.3%) were 'true' CBC's. Of the 837 true CBC's included in the study, 477 (56.7%) were for male patients and 360 (43.3%) were for the females. We evaluated the month-wise distribution of the CBC's;the month with the highest number of calls in Group I was January 2019 (n = 29, 17.3%), while in Group II it was December 2020 (n = 59, 23.1%). The arrival time of the code blue team was significantly different between the groups, e.g., 3.15 +/- 0.52 vs. 3.81 +/- 0.58 min in Group I vs. Group II respectively. Conclusion(s): The intervention times of the code blue team and the success of cardiopulmonary resuscitation were observed to be comparable during the pre-pandemic and pandemic periods. The duration of commencement of intervention is important for the efficacy of cardiopulmonary resuscitation during a pandemic.Copyright © 2023 Faculty of Anaesthesia, Pain and Intensive Care, AFMS. All rights reserved.

Cardio pulmonary resuscitation (CPR) in the frail and multimorbid;outcomes before and during the COVID pandemic

IntroductionSARS-COV2 placed greater emphasis on identifying frail or comorbid patients early and limiting treatment where appropriate. Resuscitation guidelines changed as cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) was classified an aerosol generating procedure (AGP). We assessed the impact of these changes in our tertiary centre focusing on frail and/or comorbid patients.MethodsRetrospective analysis of prospectively collected data from contemporaneous clinical and electronic records for all patients with a recorded cardiac arrest between June 2020 and June 2021. Data collected on features of the cardiac arrest, clinical frailty scale (CFS), Charlson comorbidity index (CCI), survival at discharge, 30 days and 12 months. The comparator was our previously published cohort between April 2017 to March 2018.Results62 patients studied compared to 113 in 2017–18. 20 patients survived to discharge, 30 days and 1 year. This 32.2% survival rate is higher than the 23.8% observed in 2017–18 but not statistically significant (p=0.235). Rates of ROSC similar in both studies (61.3% v 60.2% p=0.960). Median CFS was significantly lower (3.4 v 4.2, p=0.006) as was median CCI (4.1 v 5.7, p001 more patients received CPR in the cardiology department (64.5% v 38.9% p=‘0.002).'ConclusionThere was a dramatic reduction in cardiac arrest events on medical and surgical wards with little change in arrests within the cardiology department. The improvement in survival rate observed in this study is multifactorial but likely includes a less frail and comorbid population and a higher proportion of cardiac arrests in a shockable rhythm. CPR outcomes improved due to better patient selection. No evidence to show COVID ALS guidelines affect outcomes.

Exposure-response relationship between COVID-19 incidence rate and incidence and survival of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA).

Aim: We aimed to report the epidemiology of OHCA, bystander CPR pattern and other Utstein factors in a region in Hong Kong during the COVID-19 pandemic. In particular, we studied the relationship between COVID-19 incidence, OHCA incidence and survival outcome. Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study that used data from our registry to compare features of OHCA during pre-pandemic (Jan 2018 to Dec 2019), low-incidence pandemic (Jan 2020 to Dec 2021) and high-incidence pandemic (Jan to Mar 2022). We used multivariable logistic regression to identify survival predictors. Results: Incidence of OHCA increased dramatically with surging COVID-19 incidence (65.9 vs 74.2 vs 159.2 per 100,000 population per year, p < 0.001). During the pandemic, there were more indoor OHCA (89.3% vs 92.6% vs 97.4%, p < 0.001), fewer witnessed arrest (38.5% vs 38.3% vs 29.6%, p = 0.001), and longer median time to basic life support upon receiving call (9 min vs 10 min vs 14 min, p < 0.001). There was a higher proportion of OHCA cases with bystander-CPR (26.1% vs 31.3% vs 35.3%, p < 0.001). The proportion of cases with survival to admission (STA) (30.8% vs 22.2% vs 15.4%, p < 0.001) and survival to discharge (STD) (2.2% vs 1.0% vs 0.2%, p = 0.001) were lowered. After controlling for confounders, the odds of STA was reduced by 33% and 55% during the low-incidence and high-incidence pandemic respectively. Conclusion: The increase in COVID-19 incidence had an exposure-response relationship with an increased incidence of OHCA and worsened survival outcomes.

Did lockdown influence bystanders' willingness to perform cardiopulmonary resuscitation? A worldwide registry-based perspective.

AIM: Bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) significantly increases the survival rate after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Using population-based registries, we investigated the impact of lockdown due to Covid-19 on the provision of bystander CPR, taking background changes over time into consideration. METHODS: Using a registry network, we invited all registries capable of delivering data from 1. January 2017 to 31. December 2020 to participate in this study. We used negative binominal regression for the analysis of the overall results. We also calculated the rates for bystander CPR. For every participating registry, we analysed the incidence per 100000 inhabitants of bystander CPR and EMS-treated patients using Poisson regression, including time trends. RESULTS: Twenty-six established OHCA registries reported 742 923 cardiac arrest patients over a four-year period covering 1.3 billion person-years. We found large variations in the reported incidence between and within continents. There was an increase in the incidence of bystander CPR of almost 5% per year. The lockdown in March/April 2020 did not impact this trend. The increase in the rate of bystander CPR was also seen when analysing data on a continental level. We found large variations in incidence of bystander CPR before and after lockdown when analysing data on a registry level. CONCLUSION: There was a steady increase in bystander CPR from 2017 to 2020, not associated with an increase in the number of ambulance-treated cardiac arrest patients. We did not find an association between lockdown and bystanders' willingness to start CPR before ambulance arrival, but we found inconsistent patterns of changes between registries.

Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on prehospital characteristics and outcomes of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest among the elderly in Japan: A nationwide study.

Aim: To assess the impact of the 2020 coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic on the prehospital characteristics and outcomes of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) in the elderly. Methods: In this population-based nationwide observational study in Japan, 563,100 emergency medical service-unwitnessed OHCAs in elderly (≥65 years) patients involving any prehospital resuscitation efforts were analysed (144,756, 140,741, 140,610, and 136,993 cases in 2020, 2019, 2018, and 2017, respectively). The epidemiology, characteristics, and outcomes associated with OHCAs in elderly patients were compared between 3 years pre-pandemic (2017-2019) and the pandemic year (2020). The primary outcome was neurologically favourable one-month survival. The secondary outcomes were the rate of bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), defibrillation by a bystander, dispatcher-assisted (DA)-CPR attempts, and one-month survival. Results: During the pandemic year, the rates of neurologically favourable 1-month survival (crude odds ratio, 95% confidence interval: 1.19, 1.14-1.25), bystander CPR (1.04, 1.03-1.06), and DA-CPR attempts (1.10, 1.08-1.11) increased, whereas the incidence of public access defibrillation (0.88, 0.83-0.93) decreased. Subgroup analyses based on interaction tests showed that the increased rate of neurologically favourable survival during the pandemic year was enhanced in OHCA at care facilities (1.51, 1.36-1.68) and diminished or abolished on state-of-emergency days (0.90, 0.74-1.09), in the mainly affected prefectures (1.08, 1.01-1.15), and in cases with shockable initial rhythms (1.03, 0.96-1.12). Conclusions: The COVID-19 pandemic increased the bystander CPR rate in association with enhanced DA-CPR attempts and improved the outcomes of elderly patients with OHCAs.

Impact of Personal Protective Equipment on the Quality of Chest Compressions in Prehospital Care: A Prospective Randomized Crossover Study

Introduction:The use of personal protective equipment (PPE) in prehospital emergency care has significantly increased since the onset of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. Several studies investigating the potential effects of PPE use by Emergency Medical Service providers on the quality of chest compressions during resuscitation have been inconclusive.Study Objectives:This study aimed to determine whether the use of PPE affects the quality of chest compressions or influences select physiological biomarkers that are associated with stress.Methods:This was a prospective randomized, quasi-experimental crossover study with 35 Emergency Medical Service providers who performed 20 minutes of chest compressions on a manikin. Two iterations were completed in a randomized order: (1) without PPE and (2) with PPE consisting of Tyvek, goggles, KN95 mask, and nitrile gloves. The rate and depth of chest compressions were measured. Salivary cortisol, lactate, end-tidal carbon dioxide (EtCO2), and body temperature were measured before and after each set of chest compressions.Results:There were no differences in the quality of chest compressions (rate and depth) between the two groups (P >.05). After performing chest compressions, the group with PPE did not have elevated levels of cortisol, lactate, or EtCO2 when compared to the group without PPE, but did have a higher body temperature (P <.001).Conclusion:The use of PPE during resuscitation did not lower the quality of chest compressions, nor did it lead to higher stress-associated biomarker levels, with the exception of body temperature.

A Multimodal Approach to Training COVID-19 Processes Across Four Intensive Care Units.

Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) required innovative training strategies for emergent aerosol generating procedures (AGPs) in intensive care units (ICUs). This manuscript summarizes institutional operationalization of COVID-specific training, standardized across four ICUs. An interdisciplinary team collaborated with the Simulator Program and OpenPediatrics refining logistics using process maps, walkthroughs and simulation. A multimodal approach to information dissemination, high-volume team training in modified resuscitation practices and technical skill acquisition included instructional videos, training superusers, small-group simulation using a flipped classroom approach with rapid cycle deliberate practice, interactive webinars, and cognitive aids. Institutional data on application of this model are presented. Success was founded in interdisciplinary collaboration, resource availability and institutional buy in.

Simulated Learning Experiences Impact on Acute Care Confidence Development in Students with Low Resiliency

PURPOSE/HYPOTHESIS: The COVID-19 pandemic has taken a toll on the psychological resilience of healthcare workers across the world but has also had a significant impact on healthcare professionals in training. The pandemic has required educators to adapt how they teach but also to take into consideration innovative learning activities to increase students' resiliency. The purpose of this study was to assess the impact of high-fidelity human simulation (HFHS) sessions on acute care confidence in a critical care setting in physical therapy students' who rate their resiliency at low levels. NUMBER OF SUBJECTS: Eighty-one DPT students. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One week prior to the HFHS sessions each subject completed the Acute Care Confidence Survey (ACCS) and the Brief Resiliency Scale (BRS). All subjects participated in 2 HFHS sessions in a 3-member team and were given objectives and a case history 1 week prior to each HFHS experience. The HFHS used the Laerdal's SimMan 3G manikin equipped with an oxygen delivery system, lines and tubes and a monitor displaying vitals. The format for each simulation lab included a 15-minute pre-brief session, a 20-minute SimMan encounter and an immediate 15-minute debrief session. Following the completion of the HFHS learning experience each student completed a second ACCS. RESULT(S): A Kruskal-Wallis test was used to compare confidence score across low, normal, and high resilience groups. Low and normal resiliency level students had significantly lower confidence in manual skills prior to simulation (P< 05) compared to their high resiliency counterparts. Following simulation, all resiliency groups demonstrated confidence improvement that resulted in no significant differences between the groups. A Wilcoxon Signed Ranks Test revealed significant improvement in all confidence scores for each group following simulation. CONCLUSION(S): Resiliency levels did not impact students' ability to gain confidence from simulation training. HFHS when graded has been shown to increase stress and decrease confidence in students. These HFHS learning activity exposures were not graded which may have allowed those students with lower resiliency to learn in a less stressful environment and still develop confidence. A positive change in student confidence may be more related to a graded exposure to an acute care setting that allows skill development in a low stress environment. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The simulation sessions increased student confidence by providing a realistic clinical environment and expectations, with confidence being less impacted by a student's resiliency. This low stake learning environment provided a valuable opportunity for students to improve clinical confidence regardless of their self-rated resiliency level.

Impact of Personal Protective Equipment on the Quality of Chest Compressions in Prehospital Care: A Prospective Randomized Crossover Study

Introduction:The use of personal protective equipment (PPE) in prehospital emergency care has significantly increased since the onset of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. Several studies investigating the potential effects of PPE use by Emergency Medical Service providers on the quality of chest compressions during resuscitation have been inconclusive.Study Objectives:This study aimed to determine whether the use of PPE affects the quality of chest compressions or influences select physiological biomarkers that are associated with stress.Methods:This was a prospective randomized, quasi-experimental crossover study with 35 Emergency Medical Service providers who performed 20 minutes of chest compressions on a manikin. Two iterations were completed in a randomized order: (1) without PPE and (2) with PPE consisting of Tyvek, goggles, KN95 mask, and nitrile gloves. The rate and depth of chest compressions were measured. Salivary cortisol, lactate, end-tidal carbon dioxide (EtCO2), and body temperature were measured before and after each set of chest compressions.Results:There were no differences in the quality of chest compressions (rate and depth) between the two groups (P >.05). After performing chest compressions, the group with PPE did not have elevated levels of cortisol, lactate, or EtCO2 when compared to the group without PPE, but did have a higher body temperature (P <.001).Conclusion:The use of PPE during resuscitation did not lower the quality of chest compressions, nor did it lead to higher stress-associated biomarker levels, with the exception of body temperature.

Reverse Engineering Based PSA Chemical Oxygen Concentrators Design

There is an increasing need for portable respirators due to the Corona pandemic, and these devices need small size and low cost oxygen concentrators. This paper aims to use reverse engineering concepts in the design and implementation of a portable oxygen concentrator to assist respiratory patients. It also deals with the study of the properties of chemicals suitable for use in the proposed device. Practical tests of the device showed its ability to produce 10 liters per minute with a purity of 98% oxygen. The engineering style of the device is low cost, compact and can be easily used in homes, ambulances and work sites. © 2022 IEEE.

Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Systematic Review.

Objective: Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) is a prominent cause of death worldwide. As indicated by the high proportion of COVID-19 suspicion or diagnosis among patients who had OHCA, this issue could have resulted in multiple fatalities from coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) occurring at home and being counted as OHCA. Methods: We used the MeSH term "heart arrest" as well as non-MeSH terms "out-of-hospital cardiac arrest, sudden cardiac death, OHCA, cardiac arrest, coronavirus pandemic, COVID-19, and severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)." We conducted a literature search using these search keywords in the Science Direct and PubMed databases and Google Scholar until 25 April 2022. Results: A systematic review of observational studies revealed OHCA and mortality rates increased considerably during the COVID-19 pandemic compared to the same period of the previous year. A temporary two-fold rise in OHCA incidence was detected along with a drop in survival. During the pandemic, the community's response to OHCA changed, with fewer bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitations (CPRs), longer emergency medical service (EMS) response times, and worse OHCA survival rates. Conclusions: This study's limitations include a lack of a centralised data-gathering method and OHCA registry system. If the chain of survival is maintained and effective emergency ambulance services with a qualified emergency medical team are given, the outcome for OHCA survivors can be improved even more.

A Successful Case of Cardiac Arrest due to Acute Myocarditis with COVID-19: 120 Minutes on Manual Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation then Veno-Arterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation.

Acute myocarditis is one of the common complications of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) with a relatively high case fatality. Here reported is a fulminant case of a 42-year-old previously healthy woman with cardiogenic shock and refractory cardiac arrest due to COVID-19-induced myocarditis who received veno-arterial (VA) extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) after 120 minutes of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). This is the first adult case of cardiac arrest due to COVID-19-induced myocarditis supported by ECMO that fully recovered with normal neurological functions. The success of the treatment course with full recovery emphasized the potential role of ECMO in treating these patients.